Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)
What Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (16) and where TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Graphics5.6
7.2Overall performance5.5
5.8Display6.8
2.6Memory & storage2.4
2.1Battery & portability4.7
4.9Features & cooling5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025)TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025) | TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 227 mm | +49 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 311 mm | +46 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.5 kg | +1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,087 vs 8,869+36%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 105 W+10%
- GPU compute (FP32)18.4 TFLOPS vs 14 TFLOPS+31%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 73 Wh+4%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,587 vs 12,485+9%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Weight2.81 kg vs 1.46 kg+92%
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Response time9 ms vs 3 ms3×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 8,533 MHz+52%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 216 ppi+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | 14 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,087 | 8,869 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI Max+ 392, Ryzen AI 9 465 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,587 | 12,485 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,862 | 2,431 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 896 | 867 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 9 ms | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 216 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.81 kg | 1.46 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 311 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 227 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)5.86.1
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5050 (2025)5.86.2
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5060 (2025)5.85.9
vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)5.65.8
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)5.86.1
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)4.35.8
