Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)
What Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024) does better (10) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Graphics7.8
7.1Overall performance7.5
7.6Display7.0
6.4Memory & storage3.3
6.9Battery & portability8.9
8.2Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.5 mm | 269 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Width | 357.8 mm | 354 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 26 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Brightness500 nits vs 250 nits2×
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- CPU cores14 vs 12+17%
- Thickness22.7 mm vs 26 mm+15%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.8 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+58%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 140 W+27%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,690 vs 13,427+26%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- Weight2.45 kg vs 2.2 kg+11%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.8 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,690 | 13,427 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14500HX | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14500HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,305 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,471 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,175 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 40% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.45 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 357.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 277.5 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.77.6vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.77.6vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.77.6
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)8.07.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.07.9vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)8.07.6