Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)
What Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (13) and where TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Graphics8.1
6.7Overall performance7.3
7.6Display5.3
6.4Memory & storage2.9
6.9Battery & portability9.0
8.2Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024)TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024) | TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.5 mm | 251 mm | +26.5 mm |
| Width | 357.8 mm | 354 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 25 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Response time7 ms vs 27 ms3.9×
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Thickness22.7 mm vs 25 mm+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)12.1 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+80%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 140 W+27%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,834 vs 13,738+56%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Weight2.45 kg vs 2.2 kg+11%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.1 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,834 | 13,738 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14500HX | Ryzen 9 8945H |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14500HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,305 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,471 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,175 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 27 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 70% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.45 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 357.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 277.5 mm | 251 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 46 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024)7.26.8vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo Legion 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024)7.27.0vs
Acer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.27.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.67.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.67.6