Acer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026) vs Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)
What Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026) does better (7) and where TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display7.1
2.2Memory & storage3.1
7.3Battery & portability5.6
5.7Features & cooling4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)
| Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026) | TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 259 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm | = |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 27 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026) better than TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)?
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 63 Wh+46%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026): No
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026) better than Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.2 kg+9%
- Thickness28 mm vs 27 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 85 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 12.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 9,662 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Core i5-14450HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 10 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,251 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,300 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 875 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 63 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)6.66.4
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)6.36.4
vs
MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)6.56.4
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)6.36.4
vs
Lenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)7.06.4
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 (2026)7.26.4

