Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)
What Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (11) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Graphics6.1
6.9Overall performance6.0
7.0Display8.3
6.3Memory & storage2.5
3.5Battery & portability9.7
8.6Features & cooling6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)
| Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 243 mm | +36.9 mm |
| Width | 360.2 mm | 355 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 22 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2 kg | +0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 120 W+17%
- GPU compute (FP32)16 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS+10%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 3,200 MHz+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)45 dB vs 60 dB+33%
- DCI-P3 coverage85% vs 74%+15%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2 kg+40%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 22 mm+27%
- HDRNo · Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- CPU cores12 vs 14+17%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 48 GB+50%
- Key travel1.4 mm vs 1.7 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | 14.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,146 | 11,212 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500H | Core i9-13900H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500H, Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13620H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,921 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,558 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 842 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 85% | 74% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 1 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 22 mm |
| Width | 360.2 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 243 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 45 dB | 60 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.4vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.2vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.6vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-57 RTX 3070 (2022)7.45.0vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58 RTX 3070 (2022)7.46.6
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.57.7