Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023)
What Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (10) and where Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Graphics6.3
5.7Overall performance6.9
7.7Display7.8
6.3Memory & storage6.3
3.5Battery & portability4.1
7.2Features & cooling7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023)
| Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) | Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 260.4 mm | +19.5 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363.4 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 26.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS+36%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,382 vs 10,845+33%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- DCI-P3 coverage91% vs 71%+28%
- Fan noise (max. load)45 dB vs 54.7 dB+22%
Why is Legion Pro 5i Gen 8 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- CPU cores6 vs 142.3×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Geekbench 6 multi-core8,588 vs 11,431+33%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core635 vs 952+50%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.5 kg+12%
- HDRNo · Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 26.7 mm+4%
- CPU threads12 vs 20+67%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 4+33%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 189 ppi+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,382 | 10,845 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Core i5-13500HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,588 | 11,431 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,081 | 2,453 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 635 | 952 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 99% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 91% | 71% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 26.7 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363.4 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 260.4 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Blue |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 45 dB | 54.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.57.4vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.57.7vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)7.57.5vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.57.6vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-57 RTX 3070 (2022)7.55.0vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58 RTX 3070 (2022)7.56.6