Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
What Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (12) and where TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Memory & storage2.0
4.0Battery & portability3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)
| Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) | TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 256 mm | +24 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 25 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 48 Wh+88%
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 1,5363×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020): No
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz+14%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is TUF Gaming A15 FA506 GTX 1660 Ti (2020) better than Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Weight2.7 kg vs 2.3 kg+17%
- Thickness28 mm vs 25 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 1,536 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,382 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 7 4800H |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 91% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 48 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 256 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 45 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)7.77.6
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.77.7
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)7.77.7
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 4070 (2023)7.77.7
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 4070 (2024)7.77.8
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-57 RTX 3070 (2022)7.75.1

