Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)
What Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (11) and where TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Graphics4.9
4.4Overall performance5.0
7.6Display3.5
6.4Memory & storage7.2
3.6Battery & portability6.4
7.2Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023)TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)
| Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023) | TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 264 mm | +15.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 395 mm | −34.9 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 25 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.6 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Brightness500 nits vs 250 nits2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,045 vs 8,129+11%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 62%+61%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)45 dB vs 57.2 dB+27%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 127 ppi+12%
Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 48 GB+50%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 6,000 GB+46%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.6 kg+8%
- CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16 AN16-41 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 25 mm+12%
- Key travel1.4 mm vs 1.7 mm+21%
- DCI-P3 coverage91% vs 100%+10%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,045 | 8,129 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Ryzen 7 170 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS | Ryzen 7 7435HS, Ryzen 7 170 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,588 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,081 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 635 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 62% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 91% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 6,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.6 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 264 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 45 dB | 57.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)6.06.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)8.06.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)5.46.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.16.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)6.16.0